Search for: "Griggs v. Griggs"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 8:19 pm
But it bears repeating, as Justice Kennedy remarked today, that we do not “paint on a blank canvas” here: There are over four decades of precedent and experience about disparate impact, building upon the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Justice Kennedy continues walking through his opinion, including how the logic of Court’s decisions in Griggs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Griggs County Social Services, 499 N.W.2d 876 (N.D. 1993); Department of Income Maintenance v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:23 am
Here’s the intro from this Cooley blog by Cydney Posner (and here’s a blog on whether Congress will actually revisit the conflict minerals rule): According to this article from the Washington Post with Bloomberg, in February, House Financial Services Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling and three other House members (Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Bill Huizenga of Michigan, and Ed Royce of California) sent a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White urging that the SEC end its appeal of the conflict… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:50 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
” Griggs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:46 pm
[…] Mr Grigg [for Ms C], in support of ground 6, referred me to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Folashade Rashida Momson v Dauda Abiodun Azeez [2009] EWCA civ 202, where the Court of Appeal considered the application of Article 6 to relief from sanctions. 29. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Finally, the Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
MackMary Beth and John Tinker and Tinker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
Zaratzian v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
In the latter case, as just noted, trade mark rights would be in play and further it might be possible for the photographer to make use of the photographs with the trade mark removed or edited out (although this Kat is a little uncomfortable with that idea, and feels it would very much depend on the photograph and how the mark was redacted).The judge then went on to note the need to take a minimalist approach in implying copyright licences: starting with a bare licence, progressing to an exclusive… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:04 am
The case is Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
” Griggs v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 6:27 pm
Justice Laskin cited Prinzo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
When Griggs v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:53 am
Toward a Definitive History of Griggs v. [read post]
