Search for: "Hasty v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 5:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: NACDL US v Bryant 04-15-16 An excerpt: I am writing to you to express the Gila River Indian Community’s concerns regarding the Brief Amici Curiae of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Experienced Tribal Court Litigators in Support of Respondent (“Brief’) recently filed with the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Terrified by Mr Ruddock’s attack on their state power base, the states responded with a hasty draft which was little more than the Defamation Act 1974 (NSW) “exported nationally”, with all its pre-existing problems. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
”  Despite record-low relations between the two countries, Israel has asked the United States for $5 billion in defense aid, up from the $3 billion annual aid which is set to expire in 2017. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
Sanders (1963), the Court invalidated Georgia’s county unit system for vote counting in the Democratic primary for nomination of United States senator and statewide officers, including justices of the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Additionally, the Supreme Court of the United States recently noted, `[m]odern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
The Senate Committee report highlights the hypocrisy of some critics of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in, Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]