Search for: "Hinds v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
On Thursday the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and rendered a $3.72 million jury verdict in Trustmark National Bank v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:26 am
We know that Peters and DeLaughter have been accused of running a similar scam in the Eaton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It happened again last week in Compere v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
Professor Hinds was kind enough to provide an Excel spreadsheet of all his data. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:52 am
Case info: Simpson et al v Baronne Veterinary Clinic, Inc., No. 10-CV-03032, filed Dec. 21, 2009 in the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
[Note: See also the similar 9th Circuit case, Team Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
Barnes- Hind/Hydrocurve, Inc., 796 F.2d 443, 459 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
As previously reported in the case preview , the questions for the Supreme Court were: (i) is the ambit of an appeal limited to the conclusions stated in a closure notice? [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
Lawyers have traditionally represented indigent criminal defendants pro bono but much of that duty has been absorbed by The State in the aftermath of Gideon v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
On Tuesday the Mississippi Court of Appeals issued a controversial decision in City of Jackson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
In late January the Frisby Defendants in the Eaton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:26 am
I have not been able to obtain much new information in the Archey v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
Frisby litigation in Hinds County. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am
Hind-sight and cherry-picking are simply not fair bases for assessing what a defendant should have known. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ; ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:37 am
ACLU, United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
That concurrence said, “While I fully concur in today’s majority opinion, I write separately to briefly state that in addition to the reasons set forth by the majority to conclude that Issue II has no merit, I would also rely on the reasoning set forth in the dissent in Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
On Tuesday Hinds County Circuit Judge Malcolm Harrison directed a verdict for the defendant in Brown v. [read post]
