Search for: "Hoffman La-Roche Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:10 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1124 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Most notably there’s Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
Hoffman-La Roche Inc., No. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:23 am
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:59 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:40 am
Sandoz Limited (EPLAW) Fuzeon (Enfuvirtide) - US: If there are no sources of proof in the E D of Texas, expect to transferred: In re Hoffman-La Roche Inc (Filewrapper) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – US: Eli Lilly appeals from grant of partial summary judgment finding certain claims invalid for double patenting: Sun Pharma v Eli Lilly (PATracer) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – US: Eli Lilly files patent infringement complaint against APP Pharmaceuticals following Para… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:23 am
" Because of the utter lack of connection to Texas, the court ordered the district court to transfer the case to North Carolina.More detail of In re Hoffman-La Roche Inc. after the jump. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Sometimes, we feel as though we're writing in code.Take the headline of this post, for example, which talks about the Accutane MDL IBD cases.So be it, we suppose: There's not a very good alternative.Two years ago, Judge Moody, who's overseeing the Accutane MDL, granted Hoffman-La Roche Inc's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert who sought to link the ingestion of Accutane to inflammatory bowel disease, or "IBD. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, has made it clear that you had better characterize an application as a "divisional" if you want to the benefit of the "safe harbor" provided by 35 U.S.C § 121. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:33 am
Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:37 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (Sept. 15, 2009), the Federal Circuit held that a patent application “designated” as a continuation patent application (even if in “substance” it qualifies as a divisional patent application) does not fall within the safe harbor provisions of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 2:06 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., No. 09-1020 (Sept. 15, 2009)Amgen prosecuted a series of patent applications relating to the production of the protein erythropoietin ("EPO") using recombinant DNA technology. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:45 am
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, has made it clear that you had better characterize an application as a "divisional" if you want to the benefit of the "safe harbor" provided by 35 U.S.C § 121. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE LTD, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH, and HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. . [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
That string of successes continued today with a decision by the Federal Circuit against its latest challenger, Hoffman-La Roche. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:26 am
"); Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:10 pm
"); Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Inc., et al. [read post]
