Search for: "Holland v. UPS INC." Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[18] Perhaps these courts meant to say that they had found that the proponent of the challenged expert witness testimony had shown admissibility by a preponderance, and that what non-disqualifying problems remained should be taken up on cross-examination.[19] The principle of charity, however, cannot exonerate federal judges from exercising the dodge repeatedly in the face of clear statutory language. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
If the current challenge succeeds, attorneys say more cases may wind up in trial -- or lead to more lucrative settlements. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Global Global – General Building from the base up, or is that down? [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
First up are a pair of bankruptcy petitions that are “identical in substance”: Bank of America  v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) An appeal to the new Patent Office Director: Repeal the single sentence rule (Patently-O) ‘Troll Tracker’ defamation suit - trial underway: Albritton v Cisco (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (The Prior Art) Q2 2009 sees record number of US green patents (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: District Court’s summary judgment opinion found to be inconsistent with its own claim construction: Vita-Mix… [read post]