Search for: "Hospira" Results 81 - 100 of 487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2017, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
Hospira, Inc. answered a question that had been lingering since the very first case -- can a reference product sponsor use discovery to obtain information from a biosimilar applicant if it does not receive a copy of the aBLA or other information about the manufacturing process as required by the BPCIA? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:27 am by Jay W. Belle Isle
Over concerns of sterility, Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company, has voluntarily recalled three injectable products, as of June 15, 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:03 am by Robert Kraft
” Bloomberg says “Pfizer acquired the plant with its about $17 billion takeover of Hospira in 2015. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Hospira, Inc., that Metallizing Engineering may remain good law under the AIA. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Daniel Taskalis
Hospira, Inc., that Metallizing Engineering may remain good law under the AIA. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
Hospira, Inc., that Metallizing Engineering may remain good law under the AIA. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:04 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- On May 25, 2017, the FDA's Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee recommended approval of biologics license application ("BLA") 125545 submitted by Hospira Inc., a Pfizer company, for Retacrit, a proposed biosimilar to Amgen Inc.'s Epogen/Procrit (epoetin alfa). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
”However, in Hospira v Cubist [2016] EWHC 1285 (Pat), Carr J suggested that he would have found Claim 1, which included the use of a standard buffer, a standard agent and a standard purification process, obvious over the CGK alone had he not already found it obvious over a piece of prior art. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBristowsby Chloe Dickson On 30 November 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the latest chapter of the Hospira v Genentech epic surrounding Genentech’s blockbuster drug trastuzumab (Herceptin®) (Hospira v Genentech [2016] EWCA Civ 1185). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm by Neha Mehta
  In District Court, Hospira alleged that the patents were invalid because the on-sale bar was triggered when MedCo paid Ben Venue to manufacture Angiomax before the critical date under § 102(b). [read post]