Search for: "House v. Hastings" Results 81 - 100 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms Awad was the tenant of a property in Hastings from 12 June 2017. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Patricia Salkin
Troy Sand & Gravel Co v Town of Sand Lake, 2020 WL 421033 (NYAD 3 Dept 7/23/2020) [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Outer House of the Court of Session has granted interim orders in an action for defamation brought by energy company British Gas against a blogger from Stornoway that require him to remove certain blog posts as well as restricting the content of future posts. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Draft in haste… Coronavirus restrictions and homelessness appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Indeed, the House has impeached over the years any number of officials for being, well, unpleasant. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Brian Hastings, the chief of law enforcement operations at U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]