Search for: "Hughes v. Rose"
Results 81 - 100
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
In particular, the Dutch District Court of The Hague’s decision that tromethamine cannot be considered equivalent to disodium in contrast to many other national courts.GuestKat Rose Hughes summarised the appeal in J 05/18 and in particular the finding that an isolated error in a well-functioning system is not equivalent to all due care.This was followed up with a further post from Rose on the refusal of Mr Justice Birss to… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
" Rose Hughes analyses EPO Board of Appeal's decision T 1218/14 which applied the criteria for the allowability of amendments relating to undisclosed disclaimers. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes reports on a recent English High Court case (Emson v Hozelock), in which Mr Justice Nugee, in a follow-up to the classic UK case Windsurfing, considered the issue of when a disclosure may be considered public. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
GuestKat Frantzeska Papadopoulou analyses the proposed new regulation regarding the Supplementary Protection Certificate Regulation.GuestKat Rose Hughes reports on the notification that the pass mark of 2018 FD4 (P6, Infringement and Validity) has been reduced to 47% (from 50%) in view of a significant drop in candidates achieving a pass mark. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
PatentsIn Purity can be unconventional, a new position for the EPO boards of appeal (T 1085/13), GuestKat Rose Hughes takes a look at a recent decision by the EPO Technical Boards of Appeal which departs from previous boards on how the novelty of the increased purity of a known compound is to be assessed. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
” Andrea Rossi reflects on when Pringles, drunk cart drivers, wine, art, and trade mark law come into contact.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes takes a look at the recent application of the Actavis case in the High Court case Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63, where the Actavis questions were applied to a numerical value for the first time.InternKat Jonathan Pratt also looks at the application of Actavis in "Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
The success (or lack thereof) of the filed applications is reviewed.The patent drawing requirements, and their fitness for purpose were discussed in another post by GuestKat Rose Hughes. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
Rose Hughes publishes the first part of the review of the “Pregabalin: Where stand plausibility and Swiss-formclaims” event hold at UCL a “great and good pass comment” on Warner Lambert v Actavis. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Typically, the entire tap unit had to be replaced to effect this change.Kat enjoying the output from a cable tap unitCommon General Knowledge and NoveltyFollowing on from Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC (Pat) (Summarised by GuestKat Rose Hughes earlier this week here), HHJ Hacon again raised the question of whether the CGK given as expert witness testimony was meant as CGK in the UK. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
IPKat's summary of the Supreme Court decision (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56) can be found here. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Hugh Stephens, in an INFORRM post, has highlighted the questions of whether and how platforms can be how hold accountable for the content they host. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:23 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
A v Switzerland, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2018). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:16 am
Author: Rose Hughes [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
There was an INFORRM case comment from Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills. [read post]
