Search for: "I.C." Results 81 - 100 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
” Her experience is consistent with the studies we reported in Part I.C.2 suggesting that people react physiologically to touches in VR much as if they had happened in the physical world. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:54 am by Jeroen Willekens
Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, I.C.4.6, II.C.2, II.D.3.1.3 and II.E.1.12.1).According to decision T 169/83, features clearly disclosed only in the original drawings can be used to define more precisely the subject-matter for which protection is sought as long as the skilled person can, on the basis of the whole description, unmistakably and fully recognise those features in terms of their structure and function as being manifestly part of the invention. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff states that the following registered trademarks and pending trademark applications are implicated in this trademark lawsuit: Mark Registration Number SPLENDA 1544079 SPLENDA 3346910 SPLENDA – Design plus words, etc. 4172135 SPLENDA – Design plus words, etc. 4165028 SPLENDA – Design plus… [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by J. Paul Pope
Any attempt to impose shorter declassification rules for the PDB to benefit presidential historians would simply result in the I.C. conveying the most sensitive information by other means. [read post]
The court granted summary judgment to Hamilton Southeastern under I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-1-10, but decided the issue of needing to separate receipts on records and returns of the taxpayer under I.C. 6-2.3-3-2 separately. [read post]
The court granted summary judgment to Hamilton Southeastern under I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-1-10, but decided the issue of needing to separate receipts on records and returns of the taxpayer under I.C. 6-2.3-3-2 separately. [read post]
The court granted summary judgment to Hamilton Southeastern under I.C. 6-2.3-1-4 and I.C. 6-2.3-1-10, but decided the issue of needing to separate receipts on records and returns of the taxpayer under I.C. 6-2.3-3-2 separately. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:25 pm by Michael Smith
The Indiana Business Flexibility Act creates two distinct categories of LLC rights:  (1) interest, or “a member’s economic rights in the limited liability company, including the member’s share of the profits and losses of the limited liability company and the right to receive distributions from the limited liability company,” I.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:25 pm by Michael Smith
The Indiana Business Flexibility Act creates two distinct categories of LLC rights:  (1) interest, or “a member’s economic rights in the limited liability company, including the member’s share of the profits and losses of the limited liability company and the right to receive distributions from the limited liability company,” I.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm by Shima Umetani Walker
A new example of evidence indicating disparate treatment based on Young was Section I.C.1. a. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Robin Shea
” [FN] The “light duty” section in the original Guidance (Section I.C.1) has been significantly edited. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
“Furthermore the compounds may be administered orally, thereby obviating the disadvantages associated with i.c. administration” (pp 3-4 of the Patent). [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
The Project on the Ascertainment of Customary Law in Somaliland, Salvatore Mancuso, University of Cape Town (South Africa)I.B           Structuring Mixed Legal Systems·         The Political Purpose of a Mixed Legal System Conception: The Case of Scotland, Andreas Rahmatian, University of Glasgow (Scotland)·         Quebec’s “droit commun”… [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
B.J. 607As stated in In re Nomiya, n79 discussed infra Part I.C, admitted prior art can be used for any purpose regardless of whether a statutory basis exists under § 102. n80 The Federal Circuit has embraced the broader interpretation of this premise: admitted prior art can be used for both anticipation and obviousness determinations, regardless of statutory basis under § 102. n81***But separately note from an IPBiz post in January 2013:Note from stratfordpub Obviousness Standard… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
” … We conclude that driving on the line marking the edge of a traffic lane violates I.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:41 am by Todd Janzen
 I.C. 35-33-5.Indiana's law also includes a provision that potentially criminalizes drone usage if the pilot takes video or pictures of another person or property without their consent. [read post]