Search for: "IN RE: PATRICIA E." Results 81 - 100 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 4:43 am by Susan Brenner
’ At other times, the caller recited the contents of Enger's password protected e-mail accounts and [said that] `we're watching every move you make’ and copies of damaging e-mails would be sent to Enger's family while he was travelling. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:14 pm by David Kravets
Patricia Mulligan, the defendant’s attorney, was not immediately available for comment. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:41 am by Paul Maharg
Sefton Bloxham is in the Chair, and announced that HEA is offering a prize for the best paper…  So no pressure there… We started with Patricia McKellar & Steve Warburton on e-readers and e-publishing in legal education. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 11:00 pm by James Andrews
“When we’re trying to reduce the prevalence of foodborne illness, labeling mechanically tenderized beef is one quick fix that has an actual impact,” Buck said. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am by Susan Brenner
Clemens, supra (quoting In re United States, 441 F.3d 44 (1st Cir. 2006)). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  They must contain the paper's title, author's name, institutional affiliation and e-mail address. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:13 am
For publication opinions today (2): In In Re: J.K., Stephen M. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:18 pm by CAPTAIN
Will Richard Hersch fly solo in his Cessna to Tallahassee and make an 11:59 am filing and by virtue of the "e" in his name, be first on the ballot in a race against "i" ? [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 12:29 am
The judges unanimously did agree to encourage the Indiana Supreme Court to re-evaluate a rule that protects a seller from a lawsuit, even if he lies about a property, as long as the prospective buyer had a reasonable opportunity to inspect the property.At issue in Drew and Donna Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm by John L. Welch
Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]