Search for: "IN RE L WILLIAMS MINOR" Results 81 - 100 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 7:21 am by David Lat
How many of the new partners are women or minorities? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Kleinberger, “The Closely Held Business through the Entity-Aggregate Prism,” 40 WAKE FOREST L. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm by Nathan
Each, however, refers heavily to Sir William Blackstone. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
This (re)turn to the common law seems to encourage the creation of a new “mythistory” – to employ the useful coinage of the American historian William H. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
” Much of protection probably took place because Selikoff’s testifying took place in the past before electronic files of transcripts could circulate rapidly, and even minor cases were posted to internet databases. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
” The study found no significant difference between participants and the control group in prison infractions, number of re-arrests, or time to re-arrest. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Do we think we’re living in best possible world? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
A minority of courts have disqualified expert witnesses “even if no disclosures occur,” in the name of the judicial process integrity.[5] Public Policy Limits on Wang Although the Wang test is sometimes characterized as a “bright-line” test, the Wang court itself was sensitive to potential abuse by lawyers who wished to silence certain expert witnesses by creating what appears to be a confidential relationship without actually sharing confidential information. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
L’amour, in its less savory forms, also features in State v. [read post]