Search for: "IN RE T A G" Results 81 - 100 of 7,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In the grounds of appeal of 28 March 2019, the applicant referred to T 1063/18 which decided that Rule 28(2) is in conflict with Art.53(b) as interpreted by the Enlarged Board in G 2/12 and G 2/13 and that the refusal in that case based on Rule 28(2) should be set aside. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:08 am
Un rescrit fiscal (RES N° 2009/65 FP 17 novembre 2009) pose la question de savoir si la souscription en numéraire au capital d'une société holding qui souscrit au capital d'une société holding animatrice est éligible à la réduction d'impôt sur le revenu prévue par le code général… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:54 pm
Savcının, borcunu ödemesi için 10 gün süre verdiği baba, 12 bin lirayı ödeyemezse hapse girecek. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:54 pm
Savcının, borcunu ödemesi için 10 gün süre verdiği baba, 12 bin lirayı ödeyemezse hapse girecek. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 12:50 pm
Savcının, borcunu ödemesi için 10 gün süre verdiği baba, 12 bin lirayı ödeyemezse hapse girecek. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:01 pm by Mathew Reisig
There are very good reasons why the state isn’t keen on letting people suddenly stockpile handguns, and under 2C:39-10(g), Providing False Information for Handgun Purchase Exemption, it is a felony to make misrepresentations that allow you to get around the state’s limitations on handgun purchases. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:32 pm
    If you are a member of the Baby Boom generation, as I am, you are probably more than a little shocked to see ads on TV about your impending retirement, usually to the tune of The Who singing "My G-g-g-generation. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:25 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Les actes de la conférence, qui sont publies dans le présent volume en français ou en anglais selon le cas, fournissent un aperçu des principaux problèmes actuels en matière de génocide. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is to be noted that in case T 14/89 the EPO had ample time, about 6 weeks before the expiry of the time limit for requesting re-establishment, in which to inform the proprietor of the deficiencies of his request. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Dies würde den Einsprechenden benachteiligen und wäre auch nicht verfahrensökonomisch. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apr. 11, 2014) (“Board Decision”), aff’d on reh’g, 2014 WL 3840551 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:19 am by Stephanie Ellis
Note that you can’t say no on this one, so I don’t suggest trying to write in a “no” answer. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 5:43 am
"I don't think we're saying we shouldn't have any liability,... [read post]