Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. L. W., a child" Results 81 - 100 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They also argue that IRUs raise the specter of state action: allowing private action to be held to const’l standards where state affirmatively encourages actor; §1983 suits would be dismissed b/c of §230 immunity. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
  We insisted that the lucky associate (a close friend of ours, but his musical tastes ran more toward c&w and happy pop than toward guitar gods) relay a message to Clapton that, of all the versions of "After Midnight," the best was the slow one that ran on the Michelob beer commercials. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
This post examines an opinion recently issued by the Supreme Court of Ohio in a “[l]awyer disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
L’Oreal—a model sues L’Oreal for putting her picture on a package and the court got tied up in whether the subject matter was photograph or face. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Lasker,“Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” 57 William & Mary L. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
The FLSA defines “employee” as “any individual employed by an employer,” 29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1), and “employer” as including “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee,” 29 U.S.C. 203(d). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
At one time you would’ve found them inside the state delegations: huge transformation in means of engagement w/int’l copyright. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 584 615 N.Y.S.2d 584 162 Misc.2d 22 CARMILLE A., Petitioner, v. [read post]