Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF TAYLOR" Results 81 - 100 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 4:18 am by SHG
For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be suspended for at least four years without automatic reinstatement. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 2:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” It went on to say that “the Second District erred when it concluded as a matter of law that Infinity could not be liable for bad faith towards its insured because Taylor did not make a valid offer to settle the case. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"the agency charged with implementing the fundamental policies of the Taylor Law, [PERB] is presumed to have developed an expertise and judgment that requires us to accept its decisions with respect to matters within its competence. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:21 am
Jon Bruno and for the reinstatement of the congregation of St. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:49 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public officer may be removed from his or her office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 Abolishing a position in the public service and the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency Abolition of positions and the assignment of former teaching duties to other teachers Absence of any reference to the benefit claimed in the collective bargaining agreement defeats the employee organization's breach of contract allegation Absence of the individual who rated the employee unsatisfactory from the… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after demonstrating that he had been improperly dismissed while serving his disciplinary probation period. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
  The lawsuit, which was filed by Oxfod University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis targeted the Rameshwari Photocopy Service near Delhi University. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:37 am by Patricia Salkin
MDEQ staff presented the matter to the Permit Board with the recommendation that a variance be granted to Errington. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:56 pm by Andrew Delaney
Taylor justified removal of the restrictive conditions of the 2005 consent order, and if so, then the matter should be remanded to the Board to consider the merits of re-licensure. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
§81 sets out the procedures to be followed with respect to reinstatement from preferred lists established pursuant to §§80 and 80-a.The Giardina is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_01402.htm____________________________  The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page e-book reviewing the relevant New York State laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions involving… [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly the Appellate Division remitted the matter to PERB for a determination as to which NIEU members, if any, [1] can be reinstated to second jobs that they previously held and, or, [2]  receive back pay.* At least one NIEU member who had been employed in a second job was paid a flat annual stipend that was unaffected by overtime rates, but nevertheless lost the position as a result of Hudson Valley’s decision. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"On another point, the Town contended that Colabella could not “properly raise claims regarding alleged violations of the Taylor Law or as to certain job classification determinations made by the Westchester County Department of Human Resources. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s decision and remanded the matter “for further consideration” as the Supreme Court “never reached the merits of Plaintiff’s petition. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s decision and remanded the matter “for further consideration” as the Supreme Court “never reached the merits of Plaintiff’s petition. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:35 am by Helene L Taylor
It cost her thousands, but fortunately, her lawyer was able to convince a judge to reinstate her spousal support. [read post]