Search for: "INTELLIGENT INVESTMENTS, INC. v. US " Results 81 - 100 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2009, 11:12 am by Jack Howell
Menard, Inc. v Commissioner (CA 7 3/10/2009)For an employer to deduct compensation paid, the amount must be reasonable. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 10:10 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Overhauser Law Offices the publisher of this site, assists with US and foreign trademark searches, trademark applications and assists with enforcing trademarks via infringement litigation and licensing. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
One such story involves Instant Brands, Inc. which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in mid-June. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
One such story involves Instant Brands, Inc. which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in mid-June. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510 (7th Cir. 1982); see also Princo Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(China Law Blog) China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents (IAM) IP rights and Chinese producers: you live and die by the jump shot (IP finance) Copyright Administrative Punishment Implementation Rules (2009) (IP Dragon)   Denmark Court finds no infringement in wine bottle battle: Udesen Danmark v Excellent Wine Danmark A/S (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ rules on bad faith in chocolate bunnies case: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli (IPKat)… [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Global Global – General How reliable are your IP competitive intelligence tools? [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 2020) and a law introduced in 2019 in France which prohibits the publication of statistical analysis of court decisions (Légifrance 2019). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Paul Bernal argues that the record of the intelligence and security services and the government in relation to such a debate is not convincing. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 16 October 2023, Steyn J heard applications in the case of Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
In this context, she briefly explained the case MZ Wallace, Inc v Fuller d/n/a The Oliver Thomas & Black Diamond, No. 18-2665 (SDNY, Dec. 2018), in which the plaintiff claimed the defendants infringed its trade dress rights in quilting handbags. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
 The bill would require that “a person making a robocall [that] uses artificial intelligence to emulate a human being . . . disclose at the beginning of the call or text message the fact that artificial intelligence is being used. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am by Dylan Gibbs
NEGLIGENCEGetting specific about the duty to warnDing v Canam Super Vacation Inc, 2024 BCCA 102How specific does a dangerous product warning need to be? [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am by jgabryno
These include $1.2 billion for Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters; $3.1 billion for different models of H-60 helicopters built by Sikorsky Aircraft, a unit of United Technologies Corp; and $2.7 billion for V-22 tilt-rotor planes built by Boeing and Bell Helicopter, a Textron Inc unit. [read post]