Search for: "In Interest of JS" Results 81 - 100 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2015, 11:55 am by Scott Brinkman
Typically this would include mortgage arrearage (i.e. the delinquent amount owed on your home loan), any outstanding car loans (at an interest rate of 4.75%), most tax debt, back child support, and sometimes a portion of your unsecured debt (such as credit cards, medical bills, and payday loans). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 8:21 am by legalinformatics
This post will be of interest to legal publishers, legal scholars, developers of legal information systems, legal information professionals, the free-access-to-law community, and all those who regularly use legal information. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:35 am by David Lat
This means that if you interviewed in September 2010 for a two-year federal clerkship in [city X] beginning in October of 2011, were hired, and accepted the offer based on the understanding that you’d get a routine bump from grade JS-11 ($63k) to JS-12 ($75k) after the first year, you were duped! [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Schachtman
[3] Krumholz HM, Ross JS, Presler AH, Egilman DS. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
How could this possibly be of interest to you, a patent litigator? [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
.'s Section 2(a) false connection claim because the opposed mark js not a close approximation of Opposer's name or identity, nor does it point uniquely or unmistakably to Opposer. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am by Evan George
  JS: The clear-statement rule articulated by this opinion is quite stunning, because it doesn’t seem to stop at curtailing executive branch agency authority. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:00 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(! [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:01 am
 JS:  On the Belizean Grove, perhaps my utter certainty is misplaced. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by INFORRM
There is an interesting Strasbourg “Statement of Facts and Issues” in a United Kingdom media law case, JS v United Kingdom (16 June 2010). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:35 am by Janet Stewart Scalley
For assistance with these or other domestic relations matters, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley at js@kjk.com or by phone at (216) 696-8700. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:08 pm by Moderator
lang=0&id=0,548,550In case you are interested, you are requested to send us your interest by sending us the enclosed form along with a Demand Draft of Rs 85,000/- in favour of Federation of Indian Export Organisations payable at New Delhi. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:35 am by KJK
For assistance with these or other domestic relations matters, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley at js@kjk.com or by phone at (216) 696-8700. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Balance of the equities / public interest Based upon its holding that ATS failed to establish irreparable harm or a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, the court declined to analyze the balance of equities or public interest considerations. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:32 am by Jay Shepherd
Follow Jay on Twitter at @jayshep, or email him at js@shepherdlawgroup.com. [read post]
30 May 2025, 7:23 am by Eva Saulnier
To discuss further, contact KJK Family Law attorney Eva Saulnier (ECS@kjk.com) or Janet Stewart-Scalley (JS@kjk.com). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:30 pm by Janet Stewart Scalley
It’s important to note that the spouse asserting the separate property interest would be required to affirmatively demonstrate the same, as mere conclusory assertions of a separate property interest, without more, are insufficient to successfully demonstrate a separate property interest. [read post]