Search for: "In Re: Blair v."
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Blair andamp; Co., Inc., 838 F.Supp. 82, 89 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).andnbsp;andnbsp; These duties have been described asandrdquo; implicit warranties of the soundness of the stock, in terms of value, earning capacity, and the like.andrdquo; andnbsp;Kahn v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Cir. 1959) and Home Box Office v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
But Blair also reckons one of the biggest problems of those who clog Scotl [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
It has been ordered to be re-tried before a three judge court. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm
He also agreed with Blair J in Puri (see our post )that in domestic law there is no general right to reputation of the kind replied up by Dr Mattu and Article 6 cannot create such a right. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
bit.ly/xamNyE (Colin O’Keefe, Boris Segalis) “If You’re Gonna Just Read One Blog . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The final week of module one brought the Leveson Inquiry to an explosive, if temporary, conclusion. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
Marshall. http://t.co/Jht3buj B-MD: Whether debtor is a "business trust" per §101(9)(A)(v) is a federal question independent of state law rules. http://t.co/BD1KjrL B-MD: Debtor is "business trust" per §101(9)(A)(v) if "primary purpose" is to carry on business & not to preserve res. http://t.co/BD1KjrL B-NJ: §506(b) applies only to postpet. int/fees/costs; prepet. penalties/int/fees/costs governed by… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
Walker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:36 am
We’re tying our themes and our exploration into the reform of the Harvard Library system that we’re a few years into, and which has scared up a huge number of interesting problems that we can take up. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm
’” [@ScottKGraham on dissent in Starr v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
") Remember Ricci v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
Byrd: The Court overruled its recent decision in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
A substantial role was also given to NCAS – particularly with an eye to avoiding unnecessary suspensions and dismissals when re-training would be a better solution. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
” and “Carole’s £1m question: Will she tell all about Blairs’ tax secrets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
