Search for: "In Re: E.G. Appeal of: E.G."
Results 81 - 100
of 4,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
E.g., N. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:49 pm
Sanctions about an OSC re sanctions or disbarment for "lack of diligence" in handling appeals, e.g., he's had 25 appeals dismissed for failure to prosecute.Monday's DJ had Moskovitz on Appeals in 'Realist' or 'Formalist':Part 2.Yesterday's DJ had an article by Justice Hoffstadt titled Beginning to see the Light: Some things cannot be unseen. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
That's the price of being on the wrong side of a lawsuit; e.g., doing something wrong.But it still seems strange that you gotta pay costs for an appeal that you didn't initiate and didn't even fight -- and that you gotta pay 'em even even in the even you prevail on the merits on remand. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 10:44 am
The former employee appealed this decision to the BC Supreme Court but the court dismissed the appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
I think Ben's argument is appealing, and I'd like to agree with it...unfortunately, there are a couple of problems with the argument that prevent me from endorsing it, as appealing as it may be. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:22 am
The agreement proposed for the forthcoming European Unified Patent Court is a highly commendable model: it provides for the Boards, e.g. to be a separate body, and to have a transparent recruiting organisation, introductory education of new members and self management by the judges themselves as well as re-education during their tenure in the court and a well organised system for removal from office. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
Additionally, the lack of a specific statement did not protect Roneika from a future prosecution for the same offense because, again, the specific content of the statement was not set forth.On appeal, Roneika interposed the preliminary argument that the State's appeal should be dismissed because the State sought relief - reinstatement of the delinquency petition and an adjudicatory hearing - which would violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm
Jealous/envious/zealous – These words seem interchangeable, but they’re not. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
In re J.C.R. (05-11-00510-CV) – Recites well-established rule that, without a timely notice of appeal, an appellate court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 11:01 am
There are a few other cases, e.g. when a Board only decides on reimbursement of the appeal fee or on re-establishment, but these cases made up less than 0.5 per cent of the examination appeals in 2012.As you can see from the following graph, in a majority of cases (about 57%), the appeal was dismissed. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 4:58 am
E.g., Hall v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:51 pm
Justice Burns correctly notes that these factors need to be "super" unfair (e.g., a "compelling" case) for there to not be personal jurisdiction here, and, yep, they're very much not. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
Some issues from the past re-exams (e.g., enablement of prior art) are likely to reappear in the Doudna fight. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:11 am
Your usual parental termination appeal typically involves horrible facts. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Never before has there been a case with the potential to limit video game patents as with the In re Bilski appeal. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:53 pm
See In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368, 1381 (Fed. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm
Which is confusing, because the opinion hadn't yet even talked about an MSA -- much less its contents -- and normally, when you say that a party gets "less" money, you're talking about (1).So a bit confusing.On the merits, by the way, I see why the Court of Appeal ends up where it does. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
and there are lots of cases (in the Court of Appeal!) [read post]
