Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice)" Results 81 - 100 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol sets out a framework by which the highest authority courts of member states may as the court to give advisory opinions on matters involving the application of ECHR rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Neutra is a self-styled public health advocate4 and the Chief of the Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control (DEODC) of the California Department of Health Services (CDHS). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:31 am by coghlani
This relied on Edward Coke,  appointed Chief Justice of the Common Pleas in 1606 then in 1613 Chief Justice of the King’s Bench (so hugely influential), who approvingly referenced a 14th Century law textbook which stated:   “Fems ne poient estre attorneyes”   If you were a fan of our last blog post, this is a good chance to practice your law French… but for those who still need a little help, it says that women cannot be… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by admin
Justice Sotomayor, in writing the majority opinion for the high court, rejected the argument that sentencing guidelines are advisory and don’t’ have the effect of increasing sentences later. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:46 am by Jim Sedor
In addition to the enforcement changes, the new rules also establish a formal system for seeking advisory opinions on campaign finance issues. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am by Evan Lee
Rosales-Mireles then pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry into the United States. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Justice Goodson is fighting a legal battle in Arkansas’ largest media markets against what she says are “defamatory” ads being run by an out-of-state group that does not disclose its donors. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
“If you’re a lobbyist who never gave us money, I didn’t talk to you; if you’re a lobbyist who gave us money, I might talk to you,” Mulvaney said at an American Bankers Association conference. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, reviews the highest profile examples of cryptocurrency celebrity endorsements, and the proposes a list of cryptocurrency caveats, for celebrities and for everyone else as well. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am by Evan Lee
Chief Justice John Roberts might conceivably be one, given that he dissented in Hicks. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes:  Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices DeWine, Fischer, O’Neill, and French. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look the recent regulatory developments and examines their implications. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  And even if you did find someone with standing to pursue the issue of whether the pardon eradicated the conviction, a conclusion that it didn’t would still leave the punishment for the conviction subject to the President’s full powers of pardon and reprieve, and thus likely to amount to nothing more than an advisory opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:46 am by SHG
On June 21, 2017, the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, Committee on Attorney Advertising, and Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law issued a Joint Opinion (ACPE Opinion 732, CAA Opinion 44, UPL Opinion 54) stating that the legal service program operated by Avvo through its website is an impermissible lawyer referral service, in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct 7.2(c) and 7.3(d), and comprises improper fee sharing… [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:34 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
But the justices let stand a lower court’s ruling that rejected the challenge. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
The Justice Department recently posted online brief summaries of three past advisory opinions issued under FARA. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” The purpose of standing, Dvoretzky argued, is to prevent courts from interjecting themselves to issue advisory opinions about the actions of the political branches — not to “micromanage” the conduct of litigation in discovery. [read post]