Search for: "In Re Breast Implant Litigation"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
Two have to do with breast implants. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:24 am
Background The claimants at issue (“Claimants”) were four women who alleged that they had been injured by silicone breast implants manufactured by Dow. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Supp. 1151, 1160 (E.D.La. 1997) (noting, in penile implant case, that “any” increased risk suggests that the exposure “may” have played some causal role) In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
When some of the plaintiff surgeon's patients experienced deflations of their breast implants â€â [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:42 am
(Or, in my old product liability life, we may have wanted women to defend breast implant or hormone replacement therapy cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
In Re Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litig., No. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (describing plaintiffs’ expert witnesses in silicone litigation as “charlatans”; “[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Singh abandoned his own interpretative principle to suit the litigation needs of the case. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June 27, 2014), doesn’t discuss Arizona law.Otherwise, courts applying Arizona law have rejected market share liability, both as to prescription medical products, In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
Class actions have, throughout American history, served as the best way to litigate group rights. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
She fought, she struggled, she did local commercials until she could save up enough money for her breast implants. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 1151, 1160 (E.D.La. 1997) (noting, in penile implant case, that “any” increased risk suggests that the exposure “may” have played some causal role) In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
In the silicone-gel breast implant litigation, the plaintiffs’ steering committee submitted banker boxes of studies and argument to the court’s appointed expert witnesses, in an attempt to manufacture causation. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Supp. 1151, 1160 (E.D.La. 1997) (noting, in penile implant case, that “any” increased risk suggests that the exposure “may” have played some causal role) In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Prods. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
In re Zoloft Prod. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:13 pm
You Need Lawyers Who Understand You If you’re reading this page you have no doubt heard the intense media attention on existing litigation being waged against the pharmaceutical industry for creating the Opioid Crisis. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Litig., 858 F.3d 787, 793 (3d Cir. 2017) (affirming exclusion of causation expert witness) Magistrini v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 2:14 am
Her areas of expertise included multi-district litigation, such as the Dalkon Shield, L-Tryptophan, and Breast Implant cases, as well as in construction law. [read post]
