Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge" Results 81 - 100 of 1,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 2:13 am by charonqc
The occasional anecdotes, nervous cough and oddly frantic panting of Sir John soon raised concerns that the inquiry chairman was more an old-fashioned English eccentric than an interrogator filled with iconoclastic zeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:24 am by USPTO
The EO required the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to identify any concerns about the patent system being used to unjustifiably delay generic drug and biosimilar competition beyond that reasonably contemplated by applicable law. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:31 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Is that what you’re telling me, Judge Pohl asks? [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:40 am by INFORRM
  He said: “If you’re thinking of calling in the HMIC to investigate the police… you would always been relying to a large extent on the advice you’re receiving from the police as to why they are pursing this properly and why there is no reason to call anyone in to independently examine what they doing. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:23 am by Tessa Shepperson
Retired Judges available for inquiries who grew up on Council estates are not two a penny. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am by Eoin Daly
Along with the recent Doherty case, which concerned the failure of the Government to allow for the moving of the writ for a Donegal by-election, this re-asserts decisively the jurisdiction of the Courts to intervene in what are sometimes otherwise conceived as essentially “political” matters conferred exclusively on the jurisdiction of the “political” organs within the constitutional order. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
“Federal Judge Disqualifies Baker McKenzie From Representing Russia’s VUZ Bank” — “Attorneys from Baker McKenzie have been disqualified from representing Russia’s VUZ Bank after a federal judge in Virginia determined a conflict of interest was present. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 7:21 am by Florian Mueller
"Despite my other concerns and reservations, I took a quick look at that decision and I understand that decision and the circumstances leading to it just the way Judge Alsup also describes that precedent. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:08 am by INFORRM
The judge himself has pointed out that we have independent judges, and their arrangements are fixed by statute. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by Jay Rivera
  Many critics feel that the clause creates a marsh of open-ended inquiries that judges might have difficulty navigating. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
" "[T]his historical inquiry that courts must conduct will often involve reasoning by analogy—a commonplace task for any lawyer or judge. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:08 am by Olivier Moréteau
‘Never again’, was the Government’s muted cry as the method of investigating the public concern was eventually replaced by the Inquiries Act 2005, by common consent a good piece of legislation. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:08 am by Olivier Moréteau
‘Never again’, was the Government’s muted cry as the method of investigating the public concern was eventually replaced by the Inquiries Act 2005, by common consent a good piece of legislation. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
  The court of appeals, in an opinion by Judge Sotomayor, affirmed the grant of summary judgment with regard to absolute immunity. [read post]