Search for: "In Re Interest of Br"
Results 81 - 100
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
Br.) [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
Hot damn, now we're getting somewhere! [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:03 am
” Appellee’s Br. 15-17. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
” Appellant’s Br. 35–36 (citingJ.A. 7828; J.A. 7871; In re Cree, Inc., 818 F.3d 694, 702(Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
It’s the “substantial government interest” that the government claims is advanced under the Central Hudson test. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
This conference will examine the ways in which exclusivity on a patent can be extended for the longest term, such as re-patenting, data exclusivity, paediatric exclusivity and regulatory extensions. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:54 am
After all, they're written by lawyers, drones of the legal sort, who couldn't possibly have anything sufficiently interesting or titillating for the likes of Slate readers. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
(FDA Br. at 15.) [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:58 am
There was also an interesting sideshow concerning the calculation of the amount in dispute. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:44 pm
[CCAF; WSJ (h/t L.O.); Thoma objection; In re Washington Mutual, Inc., 442 BR 314 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 2:02 am
Next time you’re downing your citrus-flavored soft drink, raise a glass to Arkansas! [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
” See J.A. 245; Appellant’s Br. 34; Appellee’s Br. 37–38. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
Br. 75, it is clear that finding and obtaining stand-alone contraceptive coverage on the Exchanges would be a substantial barrier for many women. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
I like my colleagues in the Finance Department, in other words, but I don't submit to the Journal of Finance (here's the latest edition - some of the subjects are of interest, but do have a look at the methods sections). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 4:11 am
Whether you're an aficionado of BR or not isn't the point. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
A whole host of interest groups (including CITMA, Marques and the Law Society) have issued a joint statement criticising this decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:27 am
” Appellant Br. 29–32 (citing Click-toCall Techs., LP v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
Dollard partially dismissed MCC's first claim, insofar as it sought to characterize WC's interest in the LLC as "nominal," on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds stemming from the Second Department's 2007 ruling. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:01 pm
In contrast in Cely, the First Department held, "Although neither the open court settlement agreement nor CPLR 5003-a requires the submission of those documents as a condition of payment of the settlement amount, defendant's request for them is supported by statute and case law (see Internal Revenue Code [26 USC] § 3406 [a] [1] [A] [corporation required to deduct and withhold tax if payee failed to furnish name, address and taxpayer identification number, information… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:08 am
After winning BR of the Year for three years running, Colin was banned from ever winning again so that someone else would have a chance. [read post]
