Search for: "In Re Interest of CA"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 6:27 am
Young lawyers, if you’re interested finding the city in this country where your salary can do the most damage, the National Association for Law Placement has a new index that’s worth a glance. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
The bill will dramatically degrade the Internet experience for everyone and will empower a new censorship-focused regulator who has no interest or expertise in balancing complex and competing interests. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
by Dennis Crouch In re HULU, LLC (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:25 am
We're terminating our analysis right there. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
(Full Board participated.) *** In Re Kirk Caraway (AD-51; 347 NLRB No. 86) Memphis, TN Aug. 9, 2006. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 2:49 pm
Applicant brought up arguments made to the EPO about a Jinek journal publication, which were not of interest to the USPTO.In a response filed 1 Dec. 2014, applicant was especially harsh to the Doudna application: "Doudna is nothing more than a mere 'second comer' and had no CRISPR-Cas invention prior to Feng Zhang. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:04 pm
But there is an interesting exception, those with a Valid C & R license can also own them. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:37 am
Today TaxMama® hears from Hammed in the TaxQuips Forum, with this interesting question. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:49 am
(Speaking of which, we’re approaching the one year anniversary of the Bressler Risk Blog… I’d better come up with something interesting for that milestone… In the meantime, please do encourage your colleagues to join our readership rolls.) [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:20 am
The district court held, however, that CAPEEM is not in privity with HAF for res judicata/collateral estoppel purposes, nor was its interests adequately represented in the state litigation to which it was not a party. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Martindale-Hubbell released an interesting report this morning called "The Profitable Legal Department: How legal departments can prosper by generating revenue for their company. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
There is also background information on each of the areas covered by the AMBA consultation (which mirrors the structure of the EPO consultation), such as efficiency, conflicts of interest, and appointment and re-appointment of Board of Appeal members.Readers are of course very welcome, nay encouraged, to comment here, but it will be of more benefit to the world of IP in general to respond to AMBA at http://www.amba-epo.org/reform. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
And this particular insurance company's share of that liability was held by the district court to be $2.6 million -- plus another $750,000+ in prejudgment interest. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:25 am
In Travelers Cas. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
Seemingly small amounts of money can quickly skyrocket into the stratosphere once you’re done multiplying the amounts by the number of employees, the number of days, adding interest, etc. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:34 am
LA, CA – Dr. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:10 pm
"It's not in the best interest of public safety when they go transient," said Hinkle. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:00 am
Here they are:Don’t mistake metrics for what we’re actually trying to measure: metrics are proxies – especially if we are trying to measure something abstract like innovation, or the quality of universities. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:15 pm
They're already on notice that they only have two tries to get it right. [read post]
