Search for: "In Re Pension Cases"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
That was the ruling handed down by the Indiana Court of Appeals in the recent case of In Re: the Marriage of Carr v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:01 am
Canadian courts do not often analyze characterization in detail, but the court did so in this case, making the decision notable. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
Consider an analogous case from California. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Pension Fund v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:51 pm
*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 1:12 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in the case of In re: McCafferty, 96 F.3d 192 (6th Cir., 1996), that the wife’s interest in her husband’s pension was not a dischargeable debt, but was instead an interest in property excluded from property of the estate under 11 U.S.C. 541(d). [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:41 pm
See Asbestos Workers Local 42 Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 11:20 pm
On 22 February 2017 the Pension Funds Adjudicator (PFA) made a determination in the matter of Maphoyisa v Municipal Gratuity Fund and Sanlam Life Insurance Limited (Maphoyisa case) which gave a very clear indication of the approach it adopts to prescription. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Therefore, according to the administrative tribunal, it is only on October 18, 2008 that the case passed into a state of res judicata. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
This theory (while sound for salary and other benefits) might be on shaky ground in the case of pensions. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 8:00 pm
This important case will likely allow the Supreme Court to re-examine damages principles arising in a wrongful dismissal action. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:52 am
On April 20, 2012, the Nortel Networks UK Pension Trust Limited (the “Trustee”), as Trustee of Nortel Networks UK Pension Plan, and the Board of the Pension Protection Fund (the “Board,” together with the Trustee, the “Petitioners”) petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit’s ruling in In re Nortel Networks Inc., 669 F.3d 128 (3d Cir. 2011), that the “police power” exception to the… [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
“My office has exposed more than $2.75 million in pension fraud in recent years, and we aggressively pursued prosecution in each case,” said State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:01 am
In the present case, the beneficiaries were in a very vulnerable position relative to Indalex. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
In dealing with the plaintiffs' claims, the Court indicated that the Pensioner Death Benefit was not an accrued benefit, citing the Third Circuit's decision in In re Lucent, 541 F. 3d 250 (3rd Cir. 2008) for this conclusion, and noting that the pension plan's definition of accrued benefit expressly excluded any death benefit and the Pensioner Death Benefit did not accrue on a year to year basis. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:00 am
Detroit may be an especially bad case of multi-generational corruption. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:28 am
SAN DIEGO PASSES PENSION REFORM by a wide margin. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 9:16 am
We're still in the early stages of this dispute, but we hope to correct the error on behalf of our client. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:28 pm
Here is a case that may now be applicable in your Bloomington Illinois Divorce: Dissolution of Marriage 1st Dist.In re Marriage of Winter, 2013 IL App (1st) 112836 (July 12, 2013) Cook Co., 6th Div. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm
Unum Life Insurance Company of America (10th Cir., June 21, 2018) (affirming denial of long-term disability benefits: Unum’s assessment was not arbitrary and capricious)*Cases marked with an asterisk are 10th Circuit cases the court declared not to be binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
