Search for: "In Re Reiter" Results 81 - 100 of 3,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
Re-establishing proper custody boundaries may deter further oversteps. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:24 pm
"Rather than putting it in a separate measure that could be discussed and debated, we're fast-tracking what will be an added hindrance to law-enforcement and will negatively affect communities in New York. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:06 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
By Michael Reiter I stumbled upon this file when I was writing yesterday’s post about car dealer taxation. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:08 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: In re DePorter, Serial No. 87229711 (TTAB Jan. 29, 2019) The post TTAB Denies Trademark Registration for #MagicNumber108 Tagmark–In re DePorter (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 11:27 am by Robbie Kenney
While we’re at it, let’s get rolling with a bipartisan panel to examine the policies and decisions that may have contributed to 10,000 COVID-related nursing home deaths,” said Pennacchio (R-26). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:11 pm
We reiterate last year's request for funny or interesting stories about summer associates. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Weksler's opinion that the tests were not medically necessary and basically reiterated all the points made by Weksler in the peer review report. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
In In re Unterreiner, bankruptcy filers Jeffrey and Lisa Unterreiner were once part of a business that co-owned three Dairy Queen restaurants in Missouri. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, as we stated in In re Baxter, “in this case, the patent examiner relied on new prior art that had not been raised [in the initial examination or] in the prior district court proceeding. [read post]