Search for: "In Re Related Asbestos Cases" Results 81 - 100 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision).The 2009 Act was passed to… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:02 am by Sean Wajert
Delaware's supreme court held last month that an employer owes no duty of care to an employee's spouse, who allegedly contracted asbestos-related disease from exposure to her spouse's work clothes. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:02 pm
Corp., 778 F.2d 1374, 1379 (9th Cir. 1985); see also In re Comm. of Asbestos Related Litigants, 749 F.2d 3, 5 (2d Cir. 1984) (declining to issue mandamus to review denial of motion to dismiss; suggesting in dicta that such denial was insufficiently final for direct appeal). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 7:50 pm by Simmons Hanly Conroy
Lawyers and firms that have been trying asbestos-related cases for decades are well-equipped to give your case the highest probability of success. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:20 pm by Patrick Crampton
We often consider work injuries to be physical or be disease-related such as COPD due to asbestos exposure. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Last year, Illinois Central Railroad won a verdict against two plaintiffs’ attorneys in Mississippi, alleging fraud in the pursuit of two asbestos cases by way of the plaintiffs’ lawyers failure to notify the railroad that the plaintiffs had participated in a prior asbestos-related case. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Here the two plaintiffs’ cases diverge. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am by MBettman
The first stage sets forth some preliminary prima facie requirements in some cases such as lung cancer cases like this one where there is reason to believe that the lung cancer is really related to smoking. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:01 am by Mike Gertler
Because only a few thousand cases are diagnosed every year, many family practice doctors may not have seen a case of mesothelioma, so making sure your doctor is informed about your risks and early symptoms of the disease can make a big difference if you do begin developing signs of early mesothelioma. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:00 pm
We know that the first asbestos-related claims started trickling in in the 1960s. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
In other cases, it means living with a family member whose work exposed them to asbestos. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Sean Wajert
  Defendants (who had not been in the first case, presumably because of the terms of the releases) filed motions for summary judgment, contending that, because Daley previously filed an action for a malignant asbestos-related condition in 1990, Pennsylvania’s “two-disease” rule did not allow him to file an action for a second malignant asbestos-related disease – here, mesothelioma. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
The passage of OSHA affected courts’ willingness to extend Section 388 to asbestos personal injury cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Gertler Law Firm
We can help you create a claim that thoroughly documents your service-related asbestos exposure and puts you in the best position to receive a quick approval. [read post]