Search for: "In Re Roger T., et al." Results 81 - 100 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Judge Pillard wrote the opinion; it was joined by Judges Rogers and Wilkins. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
I'd like to suggest to you that the views of corporate directors and management really shouldn't diverge (or at least not much) from those of thought leaders in the shareholder community. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
“It can no longer be doubted that as a matter of general customary international law a head of state will personally be liable to be called to account if there is sufficient evidence that he authorised or perpetrated such serious international crimes. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 5:43 am by Daniel Schwartz
   We have seen this time and again in the media with Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes and the folks at Uber et al and, closer to home, that fearful employee who was sexually harassed by the “untouchable” chief ended up convincing four other employees to come forward (three of which were senior executives) and that case settled for well over $1 million even though the hospital finally terminated the chief and all five employees  kept their… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon v Johns Hopkins (ISinIP) … [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
– Texarkana 1998) (noting that “[t]here is no requirement in a toxic tort case that a party must have reliable evidence of a relative risk of 2.0 or greater”) Allison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
There was a good bit of irony in Egilman’s reaching out to me to help him prepare for my deposition of him in a silicone gel breast implant case. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, et al.,2018 WL 4006425 (C.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
  (PS – she comes from California and lives on a  boat – so gets my vote on that…res ipsa loquitur on the California point.) [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Glenn Cohen
  The key decision is the 1942 decision of Justice Roger Traynor, of the Cal S. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Microsoft et al.[25]   In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner  and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]