Search for: "In re: Don Sullivan v." Results 81 - 100 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
"Translation: I have now been subject to a "high tech lynching" and to word bombs as harmful as real bombs, and that is why, and the only real reason why, I want to overturn New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:31 am by SHG
Enter Andrew Sullivan, in his typically controversial way, raising two examples. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:52 pm
  The auction site's response, with which Judge Sullivan agreed, was essentially, "Hey, we're a marketplace. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am by Will
In other words, don’t worry about disincentivizing manufacturers with the specter of massive liability, because it is unlikely to happen.Kathleen Sullivan argued on behalf of Wyeth. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:30 am by Susan Brenner
We're really not concerned with the facts in this case. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by SHG
Sullivan is only too happy to do the flippy-floppy with Europe when it’s convenient. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
The following very informative piece was written by North Carolina family law attorney  Mark Sullivan and appeared on the Solosez listserv. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
Sullivan (one-way tickets) with United States v. [read post]