Search for: "In re: A.D. & A.D" Results 81 - 100 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
CEJJ, Inc., 152 A.D.2d 69, 71, 547 N.W.S.2d 699 (N.Y. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
The Future of Class Action Arbitration Part II Part I By: Adam Prom  Ways for class arbitration to survive In light of the above class arbitration jurisprudence, it is evident that the Supreme Court is quite hostile to class arbitration. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In re Bicknel, the court granted application of two women to assume same new last name] and In re Miller, the court granted woman right to assume surname of her life companion. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
Lee, 224 F.Supp.2d 843, 845-46, n. 3 & 851, n. 12 (D.N.J.2002)(due to the expert's unavailability, the proceeding was bifurcated), aff'd, 329 F.3d 3300 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 (2003); see Garcia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
 The father was represented by John Smargiassi of Joseph & Smargiassi, LLC, of Manhattan. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 24, 2013); In re Yasmin & Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing., Sales Practices & PMF Products Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 6740391, at *17 (S.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by William A. Ruskin
Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc., 266 A.D.2d 918, 918 (4th Dep’t 1999), stands for the proposition that “there is no cause of action for emotional distress caused by the destruction of one’s property…nor for emotional distress caused by the observation of damage to one’s property. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Moskowitz , Edelman & Dicker, 56 A.D.3d 1,8 [1st "Dept 2008]  internal citations  omitted). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
 See In re Lumbar, 457 B.R. 748 (8th Cir.BAP 2011). [read post]