Search for: "In re: G-I Holdings, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
 Re-registration typically triggers stamp duty taxes. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:49 am by Russell Knight
To hold someone in contempt requires the filing of a Petition For [read post]
  In most cases, the parties should be able to structure the acquisition to address the limitations imposed by this requirement (g., by using a sister holding company to acquire the foreign target). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
During the event, [Logue] stood at the side of the road across the street from the State Capitol holding a three- by-three-foot handwritten sign protesting [Book]'s advocacy of sex offender registration laws. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:55 am
In re Monsalvat Farm Holdings LLC, Serial Nos. 88073251, 88073254, 88075987, and 88075991 (May 29, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K.Heasley).Examining Attorney Kevin G. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Some Past Attempts to Remedy the Harm from Dubious Science in Products Cases GAF’s Litigation against the Asbestos Lawsuit Industry On January 10, 2001, G-I Holdings Inc., the successor to GAF Corporation (“GAF”), filed suit against a group of asbestos personal injury lawyers who it alleged had “orchestrated a scheme to inundate the judicial system with hundreds of thousands of asbestos cases without regard to their merit. [read post]
A complete analysis of the implications of this holding are posted to Abbott and Kindermann’s blog located here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2020/05/articles/ak-news/i-lost-92-of-my-case-can-i-still-get-ccp-1021-5-attorneys-fees-a-case-study-from-the-third-appellate-district/ . 3. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[17] The Reporter charitably noted that the problem could be in the infelicitous expression of some courts that short-circuit their analyses by saying “I see the problems, but they go to the weight of the evidence. [read post]
27 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
CNOOC Petroleum North America ULC v 801 Seventh Inc, 2020 ABCA 212 (CanLII) [17] In deciding whether there is a serious issue to be determined by the Court of Appeal, the judge hearing the stay application must make a preliminary assessment of the merits of the appeal, not simply rely on jurisprudence which holds that the bar is low on this threshold question. [read post]