Search for: "In re: In the Matter of Penn Central" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 9:25 am by Jill Gross
In response to the proposal, my Institute, the UNCITRAL Secretariat, and Penn State Dickinson School of Law organized a colloquium of leading experts in the ODR field (podcasts of presentations can be found at http://www.pace.edu/school-of-law/centers-and-special-programs/institutes/institute-international-commercial-law-iicl/odr-colloquium). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by Mandelman
  And don’t laugh… that’s pretty much what they thought… and still think for that matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:00 am by Jurgen Kurtz
Supreme Court’s decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v City of New York. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:20 pm
 Suppose you're an author looking to submit your article. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  Apparently, the loss of "only 46%" isn't enough as a matter of law, regardless of the other two Penn Central factors, but the court doesn't tell us why it thinks this is so. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm by Lovechilde
Citibank’s market-worshiping CEO Walter Wriston begged for (and of course received) the assistance of big government when Citi needed it -- after making loans to the troubled Penn Central Railroad. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:06 am by Moria Miller
 “We’re considering today questions that have deep roots in American history and a core reflected in the movements of today,” he said. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Theory Edward Lee, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Copyright, Death, and Taxes We’re on schedule for copyright revision in the US, and the UK just committed to revising its law. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by J. Gordon Hylton
One of the central features of the Cold War draft was the student deferment. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Apparently, the court forgot that the plaintiffs only argued that the regulations resulted in a physical taking, not a Lucas per se taking, or a Penn Central ad hoc regulatory taking. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Progressives struggled with scientific management, wanting centralized control. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by John Culhane
And they’re not shy about that sentiment. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The city asserted that the trial court should have applied the Penn Central three-factor ad hoc regulatory takings test, and not the per se Lucas test. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”), on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed a complaint in this matter pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking recovery of environmental response costs incurred by EPA related to the release or threatened release or disposal of hazardous substances at or from the Site. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Kenneth Anderson
They took students from Princeton, Yale, Harvard, U-Penn and Brigham Young University [a Mormon university in Utah]. [read post]