Search for: "In re: Martinez Black"
Results 81 - 92
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
ARBITRABILITY OF HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS: FAA PREEMPTION AND MFA REVERSE PREEMPTION IN THE MED-MAL CONTEXT In an opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court holds that the federal law that accords states the right to regulate the business of insurance (McCarran-Ferguson Act) does not furnish an exception to the general principle that the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) preempts the TAA (Texas Arbitration Act) and other state arbitration laws when the two conflict, where the… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
Consider the case of Jose Martinez of Brandlink Communications. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:00 pm
But my biggest problem with both Black and Latino in America is the numbers. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Orsburn, No. 07-2584, 07-2585 Convictions for mail fraud are affirmed, but the sentences vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing where the trial court applied the wrong Guidelines sentence when it concluded that embezzling money from the government fell under section 2C1.1 of the Guidelines which covers frauds that incl [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Farrah Fawcett is the lawyer-in-distress who won't admit it and A Martinez her love interest in this formulaic entry.Crimes of Passion: I Know What You Did (TVM 1998). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Farrah Fawcett is the lawyer-in-distress who won't admit it and A Martinez her love interest in this formulaic entry.Crimes of Passion: I Know What You Did (TVM 1998). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
I thought it might be helpful to bring a bit of rationality to the "raw milk debate. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:58 am
A significant question facing the House Select Committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
The Supreme Court has re-affirmed this common law framework in the Warren case and its progeny like Castle Rock, etc. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. [read post]
