Search for: "In re A.C"
Results 81 - 100
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Attorney-General, [1904] A.C. 287; Lamond v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:59 am
Scott, [1913] A.C. 417 (H.L.), at p. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
In last month’s case (Dhindsa (Re)) the applicant was injured in a 2010 hit and run collision. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
In a case called In Re A.C., brought by the ACLU 25 years ago on behalf of a woman forced by court order to undergo a life-threatening C-section, the judge explained: “[I]n virtually all cases the question of what is to be done is decided by the patient – the pregnant woman – on behalf of herself and her fetus. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Pollack, [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L). [9] No statutory authority or case authority was provided to support the proposition that ICBC through its employees has a duty to provide a potential plaintiff with a warning that it is in their interests to obtain legal advice. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
The re-constituted Board had refused to buy the petitioners’ shares when called upon to do so. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
(citing A.C. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:15 pm
That means occasionally I have to go get my gambling fix in A.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Snider [1925] A.C. 396 per Viscount Haldane), or, as Justice Jean Beetz put it, “a national emergency of the same significance as war, pestilence or insurrection”—including (and Beetz J. here dissented) double-digit inflation (Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373). [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Pollak, [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
Humphrys, 1977 A.C. 1, 21 (H.L.). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
In re H (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody), [2000] 2 A.C. 291, 1999 WL 1319095 (appeal taken from Eng.); see Fawcett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
They’re not used to being around black people. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
In re A.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:18 am
"Obviously there are differences of opinion about the value," said A.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 3:00 am
Dallas City Manager Back in May, A.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:29 am
Young, [1943] A.C. 92 (H.L.), at p. 103; Toronto Railway, at p. 276). [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
Darbishire, [1920] A.C. 581, 604 (P.C.)); see also Davis, 1 F.3d at 609; In re Feldberg, 862 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir.1988). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
As HA 1996 substantially re-eacted the relevant parts of HA 1985, there was no entitlement to a private law damages claim on the part of X & Y, just Judicial Review. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
Initials = A.C. [read post]
