Search for: "In re Amend. to R. Governing Admission to the Bar" Results 81 - 100 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 5:41 am by Andrew Perlman
To make lawyers aware of the new practice authority, the Commission also proposes to amend Rule 5.5(d)(2) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to remind lawy [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
But the ABA quickly re-wrote the regulations to increase disclosure and close loopholes. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
Marshall does not supply rule of decision in present proceeding -- Bankruptcy Court may hear FCCPA action, but it cannot enter final judgment without parties' consent, as FCCPA action is non-core proceeding -- Discussion of effect of defendant's admission of jurisdiction -- Even if court were to relieve defendant of its consent to jurisdiction and treat proceeding as non-core proceeding without both parties' consent, court would still hear proceeding -- Exercise of permissive… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION and POINT BREAK SURVEYING, LLC, Appellees. 1st District.Attorney's fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Loan agreement -- In action on claim of personal loan that was poorly documented and never repaid by defendants who claim it was a gift, trial court abused discretion in awarding attorney's fees against plaintiff and her attorney based on defendant's claim that plaintiff… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:51 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in his dissent in Professor Anastaplo’s Supreme Court case seeking admission to the Illinois Bar (In Re Anastaplo 1961—which Anastaplo lost 5-4), vigorously defended Anastaplo’s position on first amendment grounds and asserted, among other things, that “we must not be afraid to be free”—Justice Black arranged for this quote, and others from his dissent, to be read at his funeral. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
In 2000, Rule 703 was amended to include its third, last sentence, which creates a presumption against disclosure of inadmissible facts or data to the jury. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Bonhoeffer, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin) (21 June 2011)  General Medical Council admission of hearsay evidence in sexual misconduct case involving eminent child cardiologist breached human right to fair trial – key paras: 108, 129. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
State Bar gave Rick something of a victory, though the release of the records is by no means guaranteed:Appellants Richard Sander, Joe Hicks and the California First Amendment Coalition seek access to admissions records from the State Bar of California (the Bar), subject to conditions designed to ensure the privacy of bar applicants, in order to conduct academic research on discrepancies in bar passage rates among racial and ethnic… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
R.1249 (Patent Law Center) (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Rich been sentenced prior to the 2007 amendment, he would have been able to seek a standard range sentence, an option that was foreclosed once the legislature amended the law to allow empanelment of a jury. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am by Maxwell Kennerly
As Greenfield says, although the settlement claims it's not "an admission of liability," it is exactly that. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
Green and many others get the concept of freedom in order to maintain a strong society, the government does not. [read post]