Search for: "In re Application of Keller"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 426 (CCPA 1981) (“one cannot show non-obviousness by attacking references individually where, as here, the rejections are based on combinations of references”); see also In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Keller, 12-6230 (a habeas case in which the Court called for the record back in November), and in Womack v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981)(“The test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference; nor is it that the claimed invention must be expressly suggested in any one or all of the references. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Keller, 12-6230. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:49 am
Cir. 1985) (en banc); see also In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413 (CCPA 1981) (stating "[t]he test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference"). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm
” In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
http://bit.ly/Qnhy2Y (@OrangeLT) At the Very Least, Lawyers Better Understand the Basics of Social Media – Budget CLO Jason Romrell –http://bit.ly/RnHwX4 (@LXBN) Case in Point: “Bring Your Own Device” - http://bit.ly/Rxuc2u (Tom Fishburne) Craig Ball on Special Masters in eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/RxXwGf (@SharonNelsonEsq) Dropbox is Excellent Tool for Legal Collaboration, Google Alerts for Staying Up-To-Date… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
Les projets susceptibles de déboucher sur des contrats en 2012-2013 pour les entreprises françaises sont les suivants : – en matière de travaux publics, la construction d’un troisième pont sur le canal, côté atlantique (250-300 millions de dollars), pour lequel le Canal de Panama lancera un appel d’offres au printemps 2012, la construction d’un quatrième pont sur le canal, situé côté pacifique… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:10 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
"); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981) ("The test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference . . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm
Detroit Bd. of Ed. (1977) and Keller v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
We sent her trial testimony and other evidence to her for her to re-review then Mike spoke to her. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
On 24 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:25 am
John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) (Methodology for determining obviousness); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413 (C.C.P.A. 1981) (A rejection premised upon a combination of references cannot be overcome by attacking the references individually); In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:56 pm
It’s also not clear to me that people who say they’re previous purchasers are more reliable when it comes to conforming with stated intent. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
Will it signal that you’re not socially adjusted or successful? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
The Appellate Division decided that this was irrelevant insofar as the parties to the collective bargaining agreement were concerned.The decision indicates that the fact that the claimed reduction in employee health benefits may have been effected by a third party, here the BOCES Plan’s Board of Directors, which was not a party to the collective bargaining agreement, rather than by the school district, does not determine whether or not the grievance is arbitrable.The test applied by the… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
” In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (C.C.P.A. 1981). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:23 am
They began their application for a loan modification in July 2009, they were current and had excellent credit… something in the FICO 750 range. [read post]
