Search for: "In re Brown (1971)"
Results 81 - 100
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
In the first two cases, irrational and scandalous or delusional claims of illegitimate descendancy were made against the estates of the late Queen Mother and/or Princess Margaret: see Brown v Executors of the Estate of HM Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother [2008] EWCA Civ 56; [2008] 1 WLR 2327 and In re Benmusa (No 3) [2017] EWHC 966 (Fam). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
In February 2015, the Federal Circuit gave its first deep consideration to these statutes in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC.[2] The IPR petition against Cuozzo’s patent had applied reference A to claim 10, and references A, B, and C to claim 17 (which depended from claim 10). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
The gold and brown go together better than the mustard and brown of the San Diego Padres from the same era. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Once I got home and re-entered my own real world, the fact that I [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Plaintiffs plead that the 1971 Hecht-Calandra Act,[FN7] which mandated the SHSAT for three of the nine specialized high schools, was passed "to thwart the City's investigation of the test's potential bias against Black and Puerto Rican students. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Plaintiffs plead that the 1971 Hecht-Calandra Act,[FN7] which mandated the SHSAT for three of the nine specialized high schools, was passed "to thwart the City's investigation of the test's potential bias against Black and Puerto Rican students. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
This result has been true whether the court has sought to move beyond traditional social norms (Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
We're slamming someone on the open forum that is the internet. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In August 2019, my husband left the house and we're trying to get an agreement. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:00 am
— which opened its first-ever store in the Market in 1971 — is experimenting with a stealth strategy in branding. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In 1971, the year before Title IX’s passage, only 1 in every 27 high school girls played varsity school sports. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 11:16 pm
[Understanding the equipment early Americans had to possess] In the colonial period and the Early Republic, laws required members of the public to possess certain arms and accoutrements. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Board of Education, with almost no desegregation having occurred during the fifteen years that followed Brown. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
See also Brown vs Calif. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Bivens is the 1971 case that provides an implied cause of action for recovery of monetary damages against government officials who violate constitutional rights. [read post]
11 May 2018, 10:13 am
A bequest can be a sum of money “$1,000 to my niece Susan Brown ”, an object “my 1971 Ford Mustang to my brother Gary White”, or a percentage of your estate “one percent of my estate to the Toronto Humane Society”. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
L.J. 1 (1971). [read post]
