Search for: "In re Cline" Results 81 - 92 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Appellants, relying upon In re Herschler, 591 F.2d 693, 702 (CCPA 1979) andIn re Fuetterer, 319 F.2d 259 (CCPA 1963),4 argue that when claiming a combination of known elements, as opposed to a novel compound, the specification “need not list examples” nor is any “comprehensive description” required. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:42 pm by Steve Hall
We're taking our time with that to determine what would be best. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As in Linear Technology, “there is nothing in the claim language or specification that supports narrowly construing the terms to require a specific structural re- quirement or entirely distinct [circuits]. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
So we're looking for US versions of the classic vinifera varietals. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:43 am by Simon Fodden
  For the next while the Friday Fillip will be a chapter in a serialized crime novel, usually followed by a reference you might like to pursue. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Spike in Demand, and Fees, for Lobbyists with Ties to Trump DNyuz – Kenneth Vogel and Kate Kelly (New York Times) | Published: 11/7/2024 In corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals, there is a scramble to sign lobbyists who could help navigate an incoming administration viewed with uncertainty and concern. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Dean Phillips and Ben Cline introduced the Lobbying Disclosure Reform Act of 2020, which would require companies, trade groups, and other entities that employ lobbyists to begin disclosing information about the “strategic lobbying services” they employ in support of their lobbyists. [read post]