Search for: "In re Cooper, Petitioner"
Results 81 - 100
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Indeed, as amicus curae National Association of Manufacturers aptly points out, the court’s requiring of the petitioner to do so here, “is tantamount to requiring that Cooper Tire violate federal anti-discrimination and harassment laws, including Title VII and [42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
We’re not quite back in every-term-a-blockbuster mode, but October Term 2017 is looking not too shabby. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm
In In re Colt, NYLJ, Apr. 14, 2017, at 22 (Sur. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm
In In re Colt, NYLJ, Apr. 14, 2017, at 22 (Sur. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Harris, 15-1262 (which eventually will be recaptioned as Cooper v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
(remanding for full hearing on equitable tolling); Cooper v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
The city adopted an ordinance regulating the establishment and regulation of medical marijuana cooperatives within the city, finding the ordinance was not a “project” under CEQA, because it will not result in a direct or reason [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am
The petitioners raised a number of arguments as to why the CPP was invalid, including various alleged procedural defects and the contention that the CPP infringes on the police power of the States. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
In addition, Cooper v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am
The petitioners included the owner of a commercial unit and its principal serving as a member of the condominium’s board. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:46 am
We’re applying your input to identify where we can do better. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co., 15-1130, and Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Phoenix Homes Ltd., 2015 BCCA 202 in which Madam Justice Neilson re-affirmed the principle in Pasnak. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
SAP (scope of CBM review); Cooper v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
, 128 U.S. 315 (1888) Cooper v. [read post]
