Search for: "In re Curtis B" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
Resigned after admitting to an extramarital affair with a staffer. (2010) [227] New York Congressman Eric Massa,(D) Resigned to avoid an ethics investigation into his alleged behavior of groping and tickling a young male staffer. (2010) [5] Texas Federal District Judge Samuel B. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  Indeed, under Rule 104(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, most of what they offer would not even be relevant because it depends on premises for which the critics lack evidence sufficient to support a rational finding. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
See In re Estate of Marcos and Jimenez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  One might well believe that Kennedy would have been re-elected in 1964, even if Rockefeller had been the candidate instead of Goldwater, in part because of the plaudits he won after his perceived triumph in Cuba, when, to quote Dean Rusk, Kennedy’s resolution ostensibly caused Khrushchev to “blink. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am by Cullie Burris
See In Re Grand Jury Investigation, 59 F.3d 17 (2nd Cir. 1995). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 710 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir.1983) (noting that a “federal court applying state law is bound to adhere to decisions of the state’s intermediate appellate courts absent some persuasive indication that the state’s highest court would decide the issue otherwise”); McMahan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
In 1991, Peter Huber, discussing traumatic cancer claims, wrote: “After years of floundering in the junk science morass of traumatic cancer, judges slowly abandoned sequence-of-events logic, turned away from the sympathetic speculations of family doctors, and struggled on to the higher and firmer ground of epidemiology and medical science. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
(For more on why Erdely and Rolling Stone could be liable for saying “[Jackie says] Eramo answered, ‘X,’” if it’s true that Jackie said Eramo said this but it’s not true that Eramo actually said it, see this post about the Republication Rule.) b. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
But some states also use private market activities abroad to transform the way they can project their own legal regimes beyond their territories, and in the process, contribute to a fundamental re-orientation of the relationship between state, market, and law. [read post]