Search for: "In re First Judicial Cir."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Maine, 67 F.3d 1029 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am
Supremacy Clause immunity was also invoked in In Re Neagle. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann (2d Cir. 2016): The fact that a suit is ultimately settled without a judgment on the merits does not impair the "judicial record" status of pleadings. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Megless (3d Cir. 2011). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
App'x 723, 728 (4th Cir. 2020), plaintiffs sued their former employer over defamation connected with their having been fired, even though this necessarily publicized the defamatory statements beyond the "gossip grapevine" where the statements were first circulated. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
My dominant reaction to this case was nonetheless that it's just silly that we have disputes like this over an oath that serves utterly no purpose in the first place. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
First, qualified immunity. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
As indicated, the first requirement is not at issue here. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
" In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 796–97 (4th Cir. 2018). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
Fogarty (In re Fogarty), 39 F.4th 62 (2d Cir. 2022). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See In re Crocker, 941 F.3d 206, 213 (5th Cir. 2019) (noting legitimacy of looking to "[e]nacted revisions in the wording of statutes"). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia for “a necessary second level of judicial permission to begin combing through the records. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
”[12] The first sentence refers to “a study”; that is, one study, one range of values. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
” When Congress first enacted section 340B in 1992, few covered entities maintained in-house pharmacies. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
Still, the panel’s majority also concluded that government’s decision to abandon its victory had to be subjected to a measure of judicial oversight. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] E.g., In re Donald J. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
A motion has been filed with the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation to have future cases moved to a class action MDL. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
" Of course, much as the "First Amendment right of access to certain judicial documents" is "qualified," so too is the "right of access" to certain judicial "proceedings. [read post]
