Search for: "In re Habeas Corpus of Factor" Results 81 - 100 of 189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 4:37 pm by SO Issues
Civil libertarians have challenged these policies as double jeopardy, preventive detention, and a violation of the centuries-old principle of habeas corpus. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am by Charles Johnson
In shock probation, the offender is originally sentenced to jail, then brought before the judge after 30, 60, or 90 days and re-sentenced to probation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:08 am by Ted Folkman
Pleau and In re Pleau, an interesting case in which Pleau pleaded guilty to murder in Rhode Island and was sentenced to prison and the federal government then indicted him on a capital charge of murder and sought to have him transferred to federal custody for trial, both under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers and pursuant to a rare writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:00 pm
After seven years at FCC, Morel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking full access to the comprehensive SOTP. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:29 am by ebcarpenter
CCRP 326 Condition of the bail undertaking CCRP 327 Requisites of the bail undertaking CCRP 327.1 Bail restrictions to be transmitted to louisiana protective order registry CCRP 328 Substitution of security CCRP 329 Contract to indemnify surety CCRP 330 Bail before conviction CCRP 330.1 Detention; bail hearing CCRP 330.2 Bail hearing for certain sex offenders; detention CCRP 331 Capital offenses CCRP 332 Bail after conviction CCRP 333 Authority to fix bail CCRP 334… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am by Robert Chesney
The Supreme Court held that they did not have a right to seek a writ of habeas corpus under our Constitution. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:14 pm by Jeralyn
They have the right to appeal and to bring a habeas corpus action if an extradition order is entered. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
Clair filed a petition for habeas corpus and a federal public defender was appointed to represent Clair in this federal court proceeding. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
Green that the habeas corpus remedy available to federal inmates does not preclude a Bivens remedy. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Maryland is not violated as long as jurors are told only that they must decide the balancing of aggravating and mitigating factors unanimously. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court Detention of D.F.F.: The Court held that the Superior Court Mental Proceeding Rule 1.3, which provides involuntary commitment proceedings “shall not be open to the public, unless the person who is the subject of the proceedings or his attorney files with the court a written request that the proceedings be public,” violates the right… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
Further, the Court found that the trial court’s administration of the medications without first considering all of the Sell factors did not prevent Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 23 Conference. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
The dissent thus argued that the jury should have been instructed on the aggravating factor. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:18 am by Dave_Fagundes
DF:  So what external factors—that is, factors other than the quality of the article itself—do influence the process? [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/837091.ip1.pdf Division One Court of Appeals In Re Detention of Aston: The Court upheld Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via 8th Circuit’s Clerk Office] In re: William Turner, 2011 U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
The Court reasoned that the revocation of the DOSA sentence court not have been a factor in the trial court’s initial sentencing decision, and therefore striking the DOSA language four years later could not be found to be a correction of a clerical error. [read post]