Search for: "In re Harris (1993)"
Results 81 - 100
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2015, 12:24 pm
Editor’s Note: Lawfare’s Headlines and Commentary will be at the beach next week. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Skyrm, 993 F.2d 374, 377 (4th Cir.1993); accord Koger v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 2010); Harris v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
“Jurisfiction” is a word coined by Jasper Fforde, author of the Tuesday Next series, one of the more sophisticated set of children’s works that has come to populate this post-Harry Potter era. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine, The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a… [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
In the case of Re: Wishart Estate (No. 2) 1992 CanLii 2679 (NBQB); (1993) 1992 CanLII 2679 (NB QB), 129 NBR (2d) 397 Riordon, J. considered whether or not a direction in a will to destroy four horses violated public policy. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:43 am
When Donald raped Ivana, as told by The Daily Beast, relying on a book by a reporter named Harry Hurt III. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Dist., Harris Cty., 1992. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Infante offered that he performed the re-calculation on a “sticky note,” but failed to provide his calculations. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
The state pointed to the exceptions to the Dixon bar found in In re Harris, 855 P.2d 391 (Cal. 1993), which include review of otherwise-barred claims for fundamental error or if there had been a favorable change in the law. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
In re Admin. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Samsung Electronics Am., 989 F.2d 1512, 1521 (9th Cir. 1993) (Kozinski, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc), and for the Silicon Valley Circuit as well. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:20 pm
Captain, you know I am running for re-election, don't you? [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
Port of Houston Authority of Harris County. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
Port of Houston Authority of Harris County. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Harris (E.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
