Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 81 - 100
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
Let me ask you this question, Is the opinion in In Re Comiskey enough? [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:03 am
“In re Jones” should be used for petitions for original writs, i.e., those in which the writ practice begins at CAAF. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reversed, re-instating the half-inch limit. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:14 am
The results are in and nature (i.e. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:08 pm
Objet: Real estate agent liability Re: Any recourse? [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
” In re Soni, 54 F.3d 746, 750 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:30 am
Another option would be to mandate shareholder approval for such royalty payments (or other RPTs), wherein the recipient of the royalty payment (i.e. the parent company) must be required to abstain from voting in view of the conflict of interest. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:29 pm
EPA is proposing changes to Clean Air Act standards for boilers and certain incinerators (i.e. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:54 am
We're going to start a new series on our Canadian blog, aimed specifically at those Canadians purchasing Coachella Valley real estate, and the best way to own their new Palm Springs areas home (i.e., how to take title). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
When we’re noting up a decision, typically we want to know if a) the decision has been appealed (i.e. history), and b) if subsequent decisions have discussed it (i.e. citing references). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:57 am
We know you and yours can't or won't follow any of them--i.e., you're a lawyer, think you are "special", and believe you're entitled to a standard that would embarrass a drunken bellhop--but you can at least try. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:48 am
The Court of Chancery recently issued its latest decision in the contentious case captioned In re Shawe & Elting LLC. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:52 am
Instead, I am on an apology tour urging in-house departments not to listen to me—i.e., ignore my long-standing advice re asking law firms about their use of technology. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
However, it has a number of drawbacks, one of which is that re-examination can be based only upon documentary prior art, and not upon prior art information made available only through the doing of an act, i.e. prior use. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
When you're reading a case about ERISA and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (i.e., zzzzzzzz), you don't typically expect to see sentences like: "the dispute in this case only concerns wives number eight and nine. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:09 pm
Once a claim is denied and the claimant becomes eligible, you could file a new claim; however, if this is done within a year’s period, the VA may question it even though there is no legal waiting period for re-filing i.e has overscale assets, then two months later these assets disappear. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
(i.e. he was not incarcerated arbitrarily, but for his own violations of the law). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:19 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement cease-and-desist order (Order) In re App Annie Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
A reaffirmation agreement is simply a contract between a bankruptcy debtor and a secured creditor (creditor whose debt is backed by some collateral; i.e. a car loan) that re-obligates the debtor on the obligation post-bankruptcy. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
The Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) says that if you market something as if you manufactured it, then you’re on the hook as a manufacturer (i.e. [read post]
