Search for: "In re Jennifer H." Results 81 - 100 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm by RegBlog
In a forthcoming article, Professors Jennifer Nou of the University of Chicago Law School and Edward H. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:33 pm
(For an excellent analysis of prosecutorial discretion and cruelty cases, as well as legislation allowing private individuals to initiate proceedings, see Jennifer H. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:41 pm by Howard Knopf
    I have attached the potentially relevant provisions of the Competition Act for the convenience of readers who may not be familiar with them. h. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Possibly Yes (But We’re Not Sure Why). [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:11 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  That is, the argument is not that "a bad thing happened, and we're reflexively blaming whoever happens to have been in charge. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Author David Garrow praised the opinion in the Wall Street Journal (prompting letters from Professor Steven Calabresi and Jennifer Mascott). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) KF9084.Z9 .N65 2013 Anatomy for Lawyers The spine for lawyers / by Samuel D. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:43 am
(h/t Jennifer Liddy in the comments of prior post.)A third out-of-state firm, The Gibson Law Firm of Houston, has also started running Google ads that respond to the Flight 3407 search inquiry:/Flight3407Search2%3A16@2-53.pdf Hitting the ad brings us to this page /GibsonLawFirm2%3A16@2-56pm.pdf with stuff written about the crash next to a sidebar that offers "Have your case reviewed today. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am by admin
Ass’n 2008 (2000); David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, and Douglas G Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” 6 PLoS Med e1000097 (2009). [5] In re Incretin-Based Therapies Prods. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  AMA Provision H-265.993, concerning “Peer Review of Medical Expert Witness Testimony,” states that:[15] “AMA policy is that: (1) the giving of medico-legal testimony by a physician expert witness be considered the practice of medicine, and (2) all medico-legal expert witness testimony given by a physician should be subject to peer review. [read post]