Search for: "In re Kidd"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 8:02 am
But, despite all of the social good we do (as Justice Scalia confirmed), we’re continually under attack. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
The Supreme Court's 2010 term opened with five cases involving the law of lawyering on the docket, and we're now up to a total of eleven by my count. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:59 am
Chip Kidd did Jurassic Park cover. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
The case should have gone to Judge Yerger (who is retiring) or Judges Green or Kidd (who do not have opponents). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
In re Barnard, 455 F.2d 1370, 1373–74 (D.C.Cir.). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm
Spanning two centuries, this collection provides transcripts of historical pirate trials from around the world, from Captain Kidd to lesser-known buccaneers. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
And right away the transcript grips you — well, if you’re a lawyer, it does. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:18 am
And right away the transcript grips you — well, if you’re a lawyer, it does. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
The Department of Justice is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court after the 9th Circuit handed down a ruling yesterday in al-Kidd v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:39 pm
PLAN MAY NOT PROPOSE EARLY PAYOFF BUT 1329 MAY ALLOW POST CONFIRMATION MODIFICATION In re Kidd, et al, Case No. 06-41232 August 2007, Judge Karlin The Court recognized changes in 1324(b)(4) and held that debtors may not propose an early pay off but may obtain the same in the right circumstances via 1329. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:39 pm
PLAN MAY NOT PROPOSE EARLY PAYOFF BUT 1329 MAY ALLOW POST CONFIRMATION MODIFICATION In re Kidd, et al, Case No. 06-41232 August 2007, Judge Karlin The Court recognized changes in 1324(b)(4) and held that debtors may not propose an early pay off but may obtain the same in the right circumstances via 1329. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:09 am
You're wrong. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976), that an appellate court could issue a writ of mandamus to review a remand order issued on the ground that the federal court was too busy to try the case.We're not kiddding: The federal court had "no available time in which to try the above-styled action in the foreseeable future," id. at 339, and so remanded the case.The Supremes decided that the prohibition on appellate review created in section 1447(d) applied only to remand… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
Also feel free to score there from Josh Krippner and Shawn Kidd. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:13 am
For lists maintained by private companies, Australia's weak Freedom of Information laws will be of no use: you'll not know what you're not supposed to know. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
And Mason Kidd says I've got it backward: Concerning your post on getting a GPS. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
Or Michael Kidd, Michael Kidd, Michael Kidd, Michael Kidd! [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:47 pm
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Princo Corporation, et al. (03/01/2007): petition for writ of mandamus to stay the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
