Search for: "In re Marriage of Branch"
Results 81 - 100
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
In re Estate of Louis Rabin, 2018 WL 6801821 (Colo. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 5:30 am
Now a very successful business man, middle aged and homosexual, he behaves in ways seemingly designed to never attract any man, even as he longs for sex, marriage, and male companionship. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
The Court could keep invalidating the re-enacted law. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
At its heart was the Court’s recognition that telling same-sex couples that they’re unfit to share in the institution of civil marriage sends LGBT individuals an official message of inferiority – teaching a lesson government officials are forbidden to teach, whatever their intentions. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
One reporter claimed to overhear someone in the Pentagon muse, “We’re taking orders via Twitter now? [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:01 pm
But my guess is they're a bit on the wonkish side for a general debate.The hosts: Journalist Jonathan Capehart, singer Melissa Etheridge, and HRC President Joe Solmonese. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Windsor, which struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, is also based on the equal protection clause but there is no such clause in the Constitution as applied to the federal government (though there should be). [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:36 pm
We're following the legal process of divorce through Arizona's family court system in this roadmap series. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
In June, it struck down parts of the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
And here the parties--Glossip and the state of Oklahoma--are on the same side.Maybe you're thinking that this is one of those enforce-but-don't-defend cases? [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
By the time the Court managed to recognize a right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
So sometimes you’re fighting for them and sometimes you’re fighting against them. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:21 pm
FISA, for example, is not everyone’s cup of tea, but it is a dense set of rules that prohibits certain types of abuses we’re particularly afraid of. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:59 pm
He said, sir, quite honestly, they're focused on the enemy. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:30 am
Advocacy campaigns she's led have targeted the United Nations and its member states, various branches of the U.S. government, members of the Organization of American States and other regional bodies, international financial institutions, and corporations. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
In 1996 Congress enacted and the executive branch signed the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
It would have taken a very bold federal judge to reach these decisions in the 1990s; today, it's almost a no-brainer--especially when one looks at the perversity of Don't-Ask (in discharging service members with valued skills while we're fighting two wars) or the weakness of the arguments offered against same-sex marriage. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Why is it only proponents of same-sex marriage who have to answer all sorts of absurd hypotheticals and not proponents of restricting the market. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
S. 562, 575 (1906); see also In re Burrus, 136 U. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:56 pm
And if we're being honest, we exercise this freedom in ideologically biased ways -- we evade even considering claims that are dissonant or discomforting. [read post]
