Search for: "In re Michael R. (1992)" Results 81 - 100 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
App. 2013 (mentioning Kramer as plaintiffs’ expert witness); In re Chan [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Sinead Ring
The court found that Michael Murray had failed to provide “cogent or proper evidence” to suggest he was at a low risk of re-offending. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He exemplifies pragmatic, nonpartisan leadership, and we're thrilled to welcome him to City Hall. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm by Joe Mullin
” Pretend Doyle’s team created interactive web features in the middle of 1992, or even 1991. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
Soc’y Y.B. 20; Michael Les Benedict, Laissez-Faire and Liberty: A Re-Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism, 3 L. [read post]