Search for: "In re Paul C. (1990)"
Results 81 - 100
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Res. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
From 1979-2009, total license fees paid by cable & satellite companies to support C-SPAN totaled $922 million. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
For requests made by the United Kingdom to the United States, evidence sufficient to meet the probable cause standard will still be required, as set forth in article 8(3)(c) of the new Treaty and under applicable U.S. case law. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm
This section discusses (a) our shallow understanding of the Cravath firm and lockstep compensation, (b) a new type of market power enjoyed by today’s super-rich firms, and (c) a new type of firm-specific capital grounded in legal expertise combined with data, process, technology, design, and business operations. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:30 pm
* * * Even though it is a secondary matter as far as the choice facing the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek is concerned, while we’re here, here is the evidence that connects the Copenhagen head with the body that was recently seized at the Metropolitan Museum and returned to Türkiye: According, again, to Jale Inan, the feet of the Met statue fit the indentations on the statue base with Septimius Severus’ name. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
In a re-post from The Privacy Perspective Blog, Suneet Sharma unpicks calls for the implementation of a federal privacy law in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
The late Chief Judge Archer explained why such arguments are unsatisfactory in a dissent he authored over twenty years ago in In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Steve C. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Paul police officer earning six figures a year.) [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Ordog, of counsel and on the brief).Paul R. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Investment Company Act of 1940 There is a saying when you’re in the woods. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Paul’s Hospital (Unreported January 23, 2002), Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED, No. 13-0573 (Tex. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
[12] The BCRA withstood initial judicial review, [13] but the appointments of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in 2005 and 2006 [14] created a shift in the Court, which has re-opened the loopholes created by the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"). [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
As John-Paul Boyd from the Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family states: “We live in a system of justice where the courts are open to all. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
C&E’s loss is a ‘direct loss. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Wyrick, C. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
From 1986-1998, I was a professor at the LSU Paul M. [read post]
