Search for: "In re Robert D. (1984)" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The Court of Appeals’ contrary analysis rests on its misreading of In re Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:02 am by lopeznoriega
., plagiar es copiar en lo sustancial obras ajenas, dándolas por propias, el plagio en los exámenes se ha vuelto legítimo en cierto oasis académico. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  They’re squarely within the Copyright Act. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm by Schachtman
Ga. 1985), aff’d and rev’d in part on other grounds, 788 F.2d 741 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S.950 (1986). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
I’ve had the good fortune to spend the better part of my career beyond those ivied walls where, as Judge Robert Bork and Justice Antonin Scalia have said, few have had the time or inclination to follow such arguments. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Universal City Studios, Inc. 464 U.S. 417 (1984) 10 Eon-Net LP v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
I initially had my doubts about that theory, mainly because I figured that since Roberts would get to assign the writing of the majority opinion, he’d give that job to himself, given the significance of the decision. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  If there was any doubt, Justice Rehnquist made it clear back in 1984. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:47 am by Jeff Gamso
Let's go ahead and do what we're going to do,' " Gore recalled during an October 1984 deposition.He said he had a "snub nose" .22 caliber handgun.They agreed to let Hommell go, he said, after she promised not to tell anyone what they had done to her. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:43 pm by Steve Baird
Because we’re talking about a chicken after all, right? [read post]