Search for: "In re Robert S. (1988)" Results 81 - 100 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: In 1989, while he was chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Thomas published a law review article based on remarks delivered at a 1988 Federalist Society event. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 10:02 am by Derek T. Muller
(Professor Robert Alexander has examined efforts from 2000 and beyond to court faithless electors, particularly in close matchups.) [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:04 am by Jonathan Bailey
There they met German music producer Frank Farian who, on January 1, 1988, signed the duo to a contract. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
With Underground Railroad I approach it similarly, re: issues of verisimilitude. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
Earlier that day, candidate Trump made public statements that included the following: ‘Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board’s Chairman, Justice Robert Blair, was scheduled to speak but was reportedly unable to get to Ottawa due to weather conditions in Toronto that morning. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm by Priscilla Smith
Vogel and Robert Pear, Trump Administration Gives Family Planning Grant to Anti-Abortion Group, N.Y. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  First, I did not posit Gary Lawson, Robert Bork, or Edwin Meese as the dependent variables in this book. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The more HLR looks like an independent publishing house operated by recent college graduates—rather than an educational activity under the watchful eye of the law school’s professional faculty and administrators—the greater the likelihood that HLR’s diversity rationale will be rejected. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]